Creating a product that just works is hard. Keeping it that way means confronting drag, drift and sprawl.
Practical analysis for independent labels and music companies navigating royalty systems, contracts, and the data between them.

Spotify’s upcoming AI remix tool could give familiar music a new life. What happens to artists’ creative control when making another version becomes part of everyday listening?

Creating and distributing music is easier. Documenting and administering the resulting interests is not. Sarah Abeson explores why that gap matters for technology.

Reliable music data takes more than one database. Najeeb Idrees explains how identity, provenance, and time connect ownership, usage, and revenue.

Steady streams don’t always mean steady royalty payments. Learn how labels can compare listening data, reported earnings, contract terms, and cash received.

An artist should be able to understand what they agreed to and follow it through to what they were paid.

The next test for AI music licensing is whether artists can follow the money from the permission they grant to the payment they receive.

The Jermaine Dupri and Sony dispute illustrates how a royalty-accounting question becomes a catalog-valuation question, and what buyers and sellers should check before it does.

Statutory royalty rates are established by law, not technology. But every rate depends on ownership, usage, revenue, and payment data.

Missing money does not announce itself. Five recurring failures can leave substantial music revenue uncollected, and each one leaves a trail.